SA: Another Week, Another Liberal Election Debacle

THE LIKELY DEFEAT of the Liberal candidate at yesterday’s by-election in the seat of Fisher means that for the second time in two weeks, Labor has claimed majority government in a mainland state; rigged boundaries may have saved Labor at an election early this year but a win in a safe Liberal seat, vacant after the death of a popular Independent, makes this detail redundant. It also confirms the start of a national swing back to the ALP.

It’s hard to imagine a more innocuous, yet pivotal, by-election.

Popular Liberal-turned-Independent Bob Such — re-elected for four years in March, only to be diagnosed with a brain tumour and pass away soon after — left behind what was universally regarded as an otherwise very safe Liberal electorate; the SA Liberals, in turn, were expected to cruise to victory in the ensuing by-election, held yesterday, putting enormous pressure on turncoat Martin Hamilton-Smith and the biased “Independent” Geoff Brock, whose sleight-of-hand deal while Such was on his sick bed propped Labor up in minority government despite garnering less than 47% of the two-party vote at the state election.

So much for the prepared text.

It appears that Labor has scored a stunning win in the Fisher by-election, aided by preferences from an Independent endorsed by Such’s widow; at the close of counting last night and with the provisional distribution of preferences completed, Labor’s Natalie Cook was leading the Liberals’ Heidi Harris by a 51-49 margin, and the only question mark around these numbers — which, if resolved, would favour Labor — centred on a reporting error by the Electoral Commission and the suggestion that with the purported anomaly corrected, Labor’s lead over the Liberals would almost treble.

Some 22% of voters in Fisher voted early, and these ballots will be counted over the course of the coming week. Even so, observers seem to concur that these will at best for the Liberals maintain the present Labor lead, or narrowly favour the ALP.

Two weeks ago, the ALP governed in minority only in the ACT and SA; now, it has acquired majorities in Victoria and South Australia, with an imminent state election in Queensland looking increasingly ominous for the LNP.

But unlike last weekend’s humiliating result for the Liberals in Victoria — which I maintain was decided on state issues — it is impossible to suggest that the result in Fisher was not influenced, in significant degree, by voter disaffection with the Abbott government.

Compounding the result in Fisher for the Liberals is that a 12-year-old Labor government secured a swing of close to 10% in what would ordinarily be regarded as a safe Liberal seat. I simply can’t think of a precedent for such a result. It is almost a political absurdity.

In my article yesterday, I gave a comprehensive critique of what is wrong with the Abbott government as it stands; and to the extent tangible evidence is required to support the case I presented, it appeared via the ballot box at the hands of voters in Fisher yesterday.

One thing that is beginning to become clear is that there is a national movement toward Labor now solidifying, at the very least in the states: and as much as state factors will influence this movement to varying degrees depending on the unique circumstances of each jurisdiction, the Coalition is failing to consolidate its position in any state or federally, with the only likely election win in the offing for the Liberals anywhere in the next few years set to occur in NSW in March — albeit with a swing of 7-10% to the ALP there too.

And in the case of South Australia, we have discussed the deficiencies in the Liberal operation and, specifically, what needs to be done to revitalise the ranks of its parliamentary wing: I do note that former leader Iain Evans has resigned his seat of Davenport, with a by-election due there on 31 January; it is not too late for others — especially Vickie Chapman in the ultra-safe seat of Bragg — to follow suit, the result yesterday notwithstanding.

My comments this morning are intended to be brief, not least because a final result in Fisher won’t be declared for some days, although it seems disingenuous to suggest it will be anything other than a Labor win.

But I wanted to include some reference to it on account of the discussion of federal issues we had here yesterday; it has been long thought that a government of one political persuasion in Canberra faced by state governments predominantly composed of the other was mutually advantageous to all of those administrations at the ballot box; it remains to be seen, however, whether this holds good over the next few years as at least one other state ALP government (Queensland) before the 2016 federal election is plausible, with another in WA to perhaps follow in early 2017 unless the Barnett government rights the state of its ship.

The point is that if ever there was an environment for a federal government travelling poorly to poison its state-based siblings, that time is now: and yesterday was a graphic illustration of this. After all, the usual “kick the bastards” protest vote that appears at by-elections, if it was aimed at Jay Weatherill’s state government at all, was overwhelmingly counteracted by other baseball bat-wielding voters determined to take aim at Canberra.

There are two points to make in closing.

One, the episode merely underlines the critical importance of the Abbott government getting…itself…together in short order; voters are more than willing to take aim at any available target to punish the kind of mistakes the federal government has been making, and whilst it is too early to speak of a “rising tide” of Labor support or similar, just how far that tide rises — and how much Coalition territory it inundates — will be determined by the Liberals in isolation from anything Labor might or might not do.

And two, no longer reliant on two Independents to prop his government up and despite announcing he will retain the pair as ministers, it would be fit and proper for Weatherill to now set Liberal Party traitor Martin Hamilton-Smith adrift: to cut the bastard loose, and leave him marooned as the isolated irrelevance he deserves to be.

I don’t like criticising my party, but will do it when indicated in the name of impartial comment; those who run off and jump in bed with Labor, however, deserve the belting they receive in review, and one of the more satisfying pieces published in this column, dealing with Hamilton-Smith, did precisely that.

It would be a small satisfaction, in view of yesterday’s result, for the karma truck to now pay Mr Hamilton-Smith a visit.

In the bigger scheme of things, however, the by-election is no laughing matter: the latest in a series of very potent warnings was delivered to the Liberal Party in stark terms by the voters in Fisher.

It is more food for thought for Tony Abbott and Peta Credlin over the summer as they mull which way to move when Parliament reconvenes after the silly season early next year.

 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “SA: Another Week, Another Liberal Election Debacle

  1. Can the LNP learn the lessons of this and the Vic elections? All their good work on illegal immigration and free trade means nothing because they cocked up the budget so badly.

    The budget repair HAS to be done properly with tax reform and old age welfare reform, NOT on the backs of the young and the working.

    Here are some ideas for Abbott and Hockey
    – Remove negative gearing that pushes Australian’s to leverage themselves to the hilt
    – Put the emphasis on area’s of the budget that are the real problem, old age welfare and old age healthcare costs
    – Increase the retirement age faster and sooner
    – Reform the stupid superannuation tax dodges that enable wealthy 50+ to squirrel away huge amounts tax free
    – Reduce the ridiculously high personal income tax rates in Australia to 40%

    I expect none of which will never happen as the LNP will never tackle the problem because it is their base, i.e. the grey bludgers.

  2. Hi,

    Perhaps one of the reasons for the size of the swing to the ALP was a motivation on behalf of the electorate to ensure a majority government rather than the perpetuation of a hung parliament. Also 4% of the swing may simply corroborate recent polls showing a state-wide swing of 4% to the ALP since the last election (honeymoon bounce), with the other 4% a protest against the federal government and the desire for political stability. Wouldn’t be surprised therefore to see this the LNP gain this seat back at the next election.

    Cheers,
    Andrew

  3. Over the last 30 yrs Labor has continued to fall over the line time and time again by picking up the preferences from the Greens and the many Independent stooges it inserts into the seats.What the Liberals fail to realise is that Australian politics is only a numbers game.Policy,finances and ideology mean nothing if all you have to do is stack the seats and receive the most preferences.In many marginal seats the Liberals primary vote exceeds Labors yet they never win the seat.This is why bad Labor governments stay in power longer and are returned sooner.The inner city electorates will continue to be a Labor/Green haven because of the concentration and distribution of population especially in and around the major cities, resulting in fewer Liberal seats.A vote for Greens and Independents is a vote for Labor.When is the Coalition going to wake up and learn?The lack of ruthlessness,the failure to manipulate and exploit by the Libs in this numbers game will continue to see it stay in opposition.Don’t allow the Greens/Independents to remain Labors upper and lower House king maker.The Coalition need to drive a wedge between Labor and the Greens.A means to an end scenario(I know it may seems abhorrent to conservative politicians)would be to preference the Greens only in the two-way inner city seats that Labor and the concrete jungle Greens fight over.If the Libs are determined to stay in opposition it’s better to divide Labor and it’s left wing partners.Making governments unworkable and finding yourself returned to office sooner rather than later which seems to be the the latest politic.Just ask Bull Shitten and the recently unknown Andrew Daniels.So if the Liberals and Nationals do nothing, then expect to remain out of office, the upper House and the game for the next 30 yrs.They need to think outside the box they find themselves in and learn to manipulate the numbers and stack the seats with their own stooges.Do something or this will remain the norm.

Comments are closed.