Labor’s Sick Joke: Boat Policy Abrogated In Name Of Blame Game

Yet another illegal boat. More asylum seeker deaths. Border policy shouldn’t be squibbed in the name of burbling bleeding hearts and compassion babble; the government can walk softly but must carry and use a damned big stick.

First, an apology to readers: I am still here, and I apologise for my silence; I have simply been so snowed under as to have had no time to pen these articles, working 80-100 hours per week as I have been. Even so, I want to post comment on this issue, even if it is hurried.

It’s become a story so familiar now that I suspect some people have become immune to it; yet another unauthorised boatload of illegal immigrants has met with disaster off the coast of Australia; dozens of people are dead.

And it is about time Julia Gillard and her government shouldered responsibility both for the endless stream of boat arrivals and for the growing number of deaths at sea instead of playing politics.

The latest call for “bipartisanship” — Labor’s trumpeting panacea for every mess in which it lands these days — has rightly and correctly been ignored by Tony Abbott, his spokesman Scott Morrison, and their Coalition colleagues.

I’ll come to the boat arrivals shortly, but Abbott and his colleagues are shrewd enough to recognise the trap and astute enough not to fall into it; and if anybody wants to accuse anyone of heartlessness or bloody-mindedness, they should point the finger in the direction of the government.

When it came to power (and this is an old story), the ALP under Kevin Rudd inherited a border protection regime and an approach to asylum seekers and people smuggling that had literally stopped the flow of boatloads of illegal immigrants bound for Australia completely.

Supposedly in the name of “compassion” and of “humanity,” Rudd’s government quickly set about closing the offshore detention facilities that the Howard government had established, abolishing temporary protection visas, and curbing a raft of other measures that had been introduced to deal with the problem of people smugglers putting thousands of lives at risk each year by sending unauthorised boats filled with asylum seekers in our direction.

Now, the results of this so-called compassion are clear to see; dozens of boats and thousands upon thousands of people risk their lives now in coming to Australia, with the cost that not only can the country not accommodate them, but that increasing numbers are dying en route — as has happened now.

What became known as the Howard government’s “Pacific Solution” unequivocally worked, and the Coalition is committed to reintroducing it.

Labor, by contrast, persists with the cack-brained mentality that anything to do with the Howard government — especially anything it has abandoned — must be avoided at all costs.

And so it consequently persists with its useless “solutions” to the issue.

Far from reaching out to the Coalition in the name of “bipartisanship,” Labor merely seeks to infect the Liberal Party with the venom of its own policy failure, and Abbott and Morrison are right to reject such overtures in the absolute.

And far from being a policy of compassion, the Labor approach to this issue is a policy of death; of Russian roulette with people’s’ lives, and the ongoing tragedy of death at sea as unauthorised boats meet with disaster is a direct and damning consequence of that.

The Communist Party Greens — with their open-the-borders-let-’em-come-and-bugger-the-consequences policy — are just as culpable as the Labor Party; but I would make the point that with their influence over Gillard government policy since entering into coalition with Labor after the 2010 election, the Greens have provided ample evidence that they are indeed the malevolent band of dangerous lunatics most of us on the Right (and an increasing number of people in the centre) have always believed them to be.

And for those asylum seekers who actually make it here, a rising tide of anger awaits them in the Australian populace; it’s not a few boatloads of people coming here now, but tens of thousands of people each year, and the government simply refuses to stop it.

Australian people do not want these people wandering around their communities awaiting processing; they do not want them rewarded with indefinite residence for jumping the queue; and they do not want — down the track — exponentially greater numbers of consequent arrivals in the form of family reunion visas that bring enormous numbers of people into the country and who add — quite literally — nothing to Australia’s society or to its economy.

I believe that family reunion visas should be abolished for all but immigrants arriving under the skilled migration intake, but that’s an argument for another day.

Border policy and the fraught issue of dealing with people smuggling, illegal boats and the resultant flood of people are not things that can be dealt with by burbling bleeding hearts, compassion babble, or on the whims of the chardonnay-swilling chatterati set which is far too trendy — and detached from reality — for its own good.

Rather, the bittersweet pill of a hardline approach is essential; countless lives can be saved, and the integrity of Australia’s legitimate (and genuinely compassionate) refugee intake policies can be preserved.

Anything else from the elected government, I’m afraid, is a cop-out, and a sick joke.

The worst consequences are there — in the form of dead asylum seekers being pulled from the water on Christmas Island — for all to see.

And let’s be clear: those deaths are the direct result of government policy, and have nothing to do with Tony Abbott, Scott Morrison, the Liberal Party of Australia, or any other entity that the Labor Party callously seeks to blame.

Some may gasp at the fact I’m not even going to sugar-coat the fact that the Labor government is directly responsible for the deaths of these people, but that’s one of the problems in this country these days; in the mad obsession with offending nobody, nothing is ever called for what it is any more lest the political consequences be catastrophic.

Yet that’s the way it is; and if the Gillard government doesn’t want to face those facts, then it must — must — forget about this pathetic obsession with the Howard government and reinstate the Pacific Solution it so ill-advisedly abolished.

It must stop playing political football; Labor is in office, and Labor must govern; the responsibility for dealing with this lies with the ALP.

And in addressing that fact, it can show real compassion by legislating policy that will stop asylum seekers dying at sea, rather than its despicable attempts to spread the blame for a policy regime which is, quite literally, a proven recipe for disaster.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Labor’s Sick Joke: Boat Policy Abrogated In Name Of Blame Game

  1. Big Sis says:

    Hi Yale, it is refreshing indeed to read something that isn’t sugar coated – I have not subscribed to doing it for many years..some like it, some don’t. I feel that it is far better to be concise about issues rather than pussyfoot around. It is entirely the fault of this Government that our borders have turned into virtual sieves with gapping holes in them. Labor has to suck up the fact thay they let a perfectly good policy go and bring back “The Howard Solution” or else there will be even more blood on their hands.
    Will this happen, I doubt it.
    Regardless, the people who get on these boats , do so of their own choice and do know the risks involved.

  2. deknarf says:

    Most of the people handled in Howard’s Solution ended up in Australia — If that’s a policy that worked, Labor is just following in the tradition!
    It seems that the NO Coalition policy isn’t about good policy its about — Power by any means, regardless of how many people die, and as long as we get a Nauru solution so that we can trumpet the backdown.
    Sadly Phoney Tony and the NO Coalition have not only become a policy vacuum “bring back the past” they’ve also become morally destitute.
    At least with Turnbull they had some political legitimacy. With Phoney Tony they have none.
    For heavens sake bring back Turnbull, get some decent polilcy out there so that I can actually vote for a viable alternative to Labor!!

  3. JohnB says:

    deknarf. The Howard solution did work on any objective assessment. The boats stopped, which I believe was the point of the policy? Isn’t the point of the ALP policy to end the people smuggling? Well the Pacific Solution did end the people smuggling.

    In 2006 we had a mere 60 people arrive by boat yet by 2009 it was 2,726 according to the Refugee council of Australia. http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/asylum/boats.php

    Even the Gov now admits that roughly 10% of these poor bastards are drowning on the way. A policy that stops the leaky boats stops people drowning, a policy that encourages leaky boats increases the death toll. The Labor gov and anybody who supports their policy of encouraging boats are directly responsible for the many, many deaths.

    deknarf, you are saying “power by any means, regardless of how many people die”. But people weren’t dying under the Pacific Solution and when Gillard is gone and it is brought back, the boats will stop and people won’t be dying. It is the gov policy that is killing people, not the opposition.

    The opposition is saying that the government policy is causing hundreds of deaths and they will not support it. In which part are they wrong? Are hundreds of people not dying? If people are dying as result of the policy, then why in hell are you supporting it? And asking others to do the same?

    But working on the govs 10% we have a probable 6 deaths in the last year of the Pacific Solution compared to a staggering 1,385 in the last 3 years. So deknarf, your policy will have caused almost 2,000 deaths by the end of this year, the one we favour causes none. Tell me again why yours is better?

    And do please enlighten me on why it’s always about Abbott. You have the Greens as partners, that is why the ALP governs. How about getting your “partners” to vote for your policy? They should love it, most of them are Malthusians and think there are too many people on the planet anyway. They should be jumping at the chance to knock off an extra couple of thousand.

  4. Ronaldo says:

    deknarf, that idea that “most” of the immigrants processed in Howard’s Pacific solution were let in to Australia is a furphy(ferfie). When you dissect the facts it turns out a lesser number were able to end up residing in Australia.
    Anyway, that’s not even the point – it IS about what stops fairly desperate economic immigrants travelling to South East Asian countries on their Passport, paying people smugglers to ship them illegally to Australia – discarding or “losing” their Passport so that they can arrive somewhere in Australian waters and claim to be an Asylum seeker.
    Once accepted they then apply for family re-union – and more of them are able to get in by this route. Just like Captain Emad and his family ! (yeah I bet you E is Mad – because E got caught – by Four Corners) and then E is able to abscond back to where E came from ???
    The previous policies, that worked are what is needed and it is only pride and pig-headed bloody-mindedness that stops Julia Gillard and Labor admitting this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s